දැන් වියහැකි දේ කුමක්ද?

Ivan tests the JVP claim that a JVP–People’s Alliance coalition could have formed a government on 2001 results, pairing the UNP with its Tamil and Muslim allies against the PA, JVP and EPDP, and noting the collapse in both parties’ votes at the 2002 local elections. Policy differences and public fear of renewed war make a lasting alliance unlikely, so an early election is improbable; he urges civil society to widen the government–LTTE talks into a broader state reform.

රාජ්‍යය ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදි කිරීම

The LTTE’s move from a separate state to a federal system of internal self-rule offers an easier basis for a settlement. Ivan argues that minorities pushed aside by the majority seek to break away, and that the state must be democratised so the majority cannot override their rights, citing Nehru’s creation of Tamil Nadu. He links the insurrections of Prabhakaran and Rohana Wijeweera to caste domination as well as ethnic and class grievances, and calls for a new constitution through broad national dialogue.

විසඳුමක් අවශ්‍ය වුවත් එය සමග සෙල්ලම් කරන්නට යාම භයානකය

Ivan argues that peace in a long war fuelled by mutual hatred requires a serious, systematic effort, while politicians talk of peace mainly to please donors. Playing with the problem can make it worse, as the collapse of the Indo-Lanka Accord and the southern bloodshed showed. Before talks, the government must build a political climate through reforms that reduce hostility among parties and revive democracy.

මැතිවරණයට පෙර සර්ව පාක්ෂික සාකච්ඡාවක්

Ivan argues that dealing with Prabhakaran requires first arresting the decay of the whole political system. Public trust in leaders and institutions has collapsed, the executive has captured legislative and judicial power, and even the Elections Commissioner and Auditor General fail in their duties, as the unauthorised gas company compensation shows. He proposes an all-party dialogue before the election to agree on reform principles binding whoever wins.

සම්මානය හා අධිකරණ නිදහසේ මළගම

Ivan welcomes the attention foreign powers are paying to the government’s anti-democratic conduct as well as to the LTTE. He argues that the northern conflict is part of Sri Lanka’s democratic crisis and that southern rulers, though elected, rule partly by terror. He proposes third-party-guided talks, an all-party agreement on constitutional principles, independent institutions, a right to information law and an election followed by a five-year national government on the South African model.