The reality of the system

Duty-free permits, super-grade vehicles and an assets law with two open loopholes. Victor Ivan uses the perks of Parliament to show how the system really works — including his own part in prising the declarations open.

Degeneration of Parliament exposed

From the old house at Galle Face to the complex at Kotte: Victor Ivan argues that a Parliament whose members trade with the government they audit has forfeited its own legality.

Securing a People’s Constitution

With a People’s Constitution now in several manifestos, Victor Ivan sets out what the model actually requires: a constitutional assembly drawn from every sector of society, and an honest review of what went wrong before.

The Parliament stands naked

A Parliament that cannot legislate, cannot control public finance and will not monitor the executive. Victor Ivan traces the decline from the land reform of the 1970s to members trading with the government they are meant to audit.

Referring the matter to the Supreme Court

The full text of the public appeal to the Supreme Court on MPs who transact business with the state, signed by Victor Ivan and some sixty writers, academics, journalists, lawyers and trade unionists.

Laundering the Parliament

Victor Ivan publishes his correspondence with the Speaker of Parliament on MPs who do business with the state — the request, the reply, and his answer to it.

Plunder of public property by rulers

Victor Ivan sets out how the plunder of public property was built into the state: laws left unenforced after 1977, permits handed to relatives and cronies, and MPs unseated by the courts then reappointed by their leaders.

Making way for a people’s constitution

A numbered case for taking constitution-making out of the hands of a Parliament that Victor Ivan judges incapable of passing an ordinary Act, let alone founding a state.

ජනාධිපතික්‍රමය ගැන නගන පුහු තර්ක

As one uncivilised era nears its end, Ivan answers those who still defend the presidency. Israel and India, he shows, keep a nominal president under a parliamentary system, and India’s model of devolution works within it. He describes how the old parliamentary system made MPs answerable and governments changeable, how the 1978 presidency reduced Parliament, and how violence has been bound up with the presidential system from its start, arguing that the electoral system must change too.